Awaiting ae recommendation emerald. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision.

Awaiting ae recommendation emerald. An EIC may also handle this process.

Awaiting ae recommendation emerald When all the reviews are completed, you can make your preliminary recommendation that will be sent to the EiC for approval. Dear Editage Insights team, I submitted my article 3 months ago to a journal. Holograph transfer service; Publish open access; Calls fork papers; Promote yours work; Cases scholarship hub; Manuscript services; Librarians. So, rejection? This is my first submission and I am very excited. ” AE should elaborate this recommendation in the message to EIC or discuss this with EIC directly. Ask Question Asked 5 years, 11 months ago. Tudor_Queen 2097 posts 9 years ago. Waiting for the results of the third round of review is really nerve The Associate Editor (AE) will now evaluate your paper based on the reviews and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected, or revised. journal-workflow; Share. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). 5 . Once through this stage, your manuscript will move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to you. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. 127 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Processing’ means that the manuscript was awaiting an Editorial Office (EO) or Associate Editor (AE) check for aspects such as adherence to guidelines, match with the journal’s scope, and novelty What does it imply if a paper directly moves from "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" but not "Under Review" stage? Discussion 6 replies Emerald reserves the right to reject work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human participants and ethical approval where required. 3 days later the status changed to "awaiting referee selection". Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. keankevin 1 post 8 years ago. can mean everything. The EiC gives the final verdict based on the AE's recommendation. You never rush an editor or reviewers. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. K. Sorry for bothering you! 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 6b42. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Modified 3 years, 3 months ago. There are, of course, many things that can cause delays to the process, but the majority of manuscripts move from one stage to the next fairly Awaiting recommendation' implies that the peer review of your paper is complete and the Associate Editor or Editor-in-Chief will check the reviews and give his/her recommendation on acceptance After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". ” 25-June-2022 Awaiting AE Recommendation 28-June-2022 Awaiting EIC Recommendation 30-Jun-2022 Accepted Thank you!! View all → Recommended. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. • Choose Reject and Resubmit when a manuscript has real potential, but it needs substantial time for authors to provide revision. Now for the last Academic Editing Services Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript Publication Support Services Customized service packs to match all publication needs Translation Services Expert help for all academic translation needs Statistical Analysis and Review Services Comprehensive statistical support to getting published I have submitted two articles to a journal. After 5 days, changed to "awaiting ED decision", is this marked good or bad? When all the reviews are completed, you can make your preliminary recommendation that will be sent to the EiC for approval. Does this indicate rejection? My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. I was rejected but offered the opportunity to make significant revisions. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". About the statuses, here’s what they mean (as you may probably know too). Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. After one week, I wrote to the Managing Editor enquiring about the Also known as with editors (APS), review completed, required reviews completed (Elsevier Editorial System (EES)), awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting decision (ScholarOne), awaiting EiC decision (IEEE), Editor Decision Started recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper has been rejected and shares a copy of the reviewers’ comments The editor notifies the author that their paper In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to To get right into it, your (seniors’) understanding of the ‘Awaiting EiC Decision’ in ScholarOne's Manuscript Central (called ‘Decision in Process’ in some other systems) is correct to some extent. 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist f40c. Ah yes, makes sense! 9 years ago. Answer. 10 awaiting EIC decision; 2023. So I'm looking for a latex template for a manuscript emerald insight / Journal of Emerald Submission Status. Clicking on this link takes you directly to the Task tab of that Manuscript. 19 third review result, accept with minor revisions or without change, all three reviewers have no comments. However, in your case, they decided to review it. ” Emerald reserves the right to reject work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human participants and ethical approval where required. Since the reviews have come in, So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) is awaiting the peer reviewer’s comments and evaluation of the paper. Modified 5 years, 11 months ago. In this case, “Peer review in Once the completed reviews come in, the Associate Editor (AE) evaluates them and gives his recommendation to the EiC. Is this 7. When reviews are due, reviewers may need to be reminded. Invitation to Reviewers The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. After AE Recommendation Letters. 5. In any case, the AE should be Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Three weeks ago, in the ScholarOne system, it showed "Awaiting final decision". Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Any idea what this means in terms of the paper's status at this point? peer-review; editors; Share. 05. IEEE I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ Emerald Publishing - UK [email protected] Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance) Lavanya Darvesh the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team Q: I sent an article to Emerald on February 10, 2023. T. For example, when a We submitted a paper to a journal roughly 3 months back, the paper remained under review for almost 2 months, after which upon enquiry to the AE, we received a reply that one review has been completed while the other is pending due to certain reasons. 11. 12 Simple Search Located on the right side of the screen underneath the SAGE Track logo, this tool is used to search for manuscripts. I re-submitted back in June and I just saw the "awaiting recommendation" update approx 5 days ago. I have previously published in the same journal 请教“Awaiting AE Assignment”问题文章结论:在学术论文审稿流程中,"Awaiting AE Assignment"阶段是指等待副编辑的指定和评价。这个环节至关重要,因为AE(相关编辑)会根据审稿人的意见对文 "Awaiting AE recommendation"阶段,AE需要在三周内给出他们的评价和推荐,但往往在截止日期的最后几天给出。 I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. You can also use ‘Save as Draft’ if you would like to save your recommendation and return to it later: If you have selected ‘Accept’ or ‘Reject’ your recommendation will now be passed to the SE I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Popular journals in the same field; Recent articles Summary: Green ash is threatened by emerald ash borer and its restoration requires breeding for resistance and adaptation to environmental gradients This is odd. Depending on the tightness of time, the AE may want to wait for more reviews or act immediately. The GE send me a comment on formatting the manuscript including in-text and bibliography as per JGOSS journal. Explore in content; Fund your resources; Librarian toolkit; Using Emerald Insight; Researchers. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Category Quartile Rank; Engineering - Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Awaiting AE Recommendation 03-jun-2024 Major Revision--decision 03-Jun-2024 Awaiting Editorial Office Checklist 09-Jun-2024 Not necessarily, depends how much work the editor/AE has on. Click on “Send for Approval” to direct the draft e-mail and your comments to the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. I'm not sure what JM checklist refers to, but my guess is that it refers to a journal requirement that you might not have met. Until the editor makes their recommendation there is no news to give you. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. This is the sequence for status of my submission at manuscript central:-Awaiting AE assignment-AE Assigned-Awaiting Reviewer's Score-Awaiting AE recommendation-Awaiting Reviewer's Score. An EIC may also handle this process. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's queue for a few days or even over a week. If the article is very logical, the analysis of the results should at least give me the Emerald Studies in Finance, Insurance, and Risk Management; Emerald Studies in Gender, Sexuality and Education; Emerald Studies in Global Strategic Responsiveness; Emerald Studies in Higher Education, Innovation and Technology; Emerald Studies in Islamic Economy and Finance; Emerald Studies in Metal Music and Culture I finally emailed the AE keeping someone from the publisher (Emerald Publishing) in the CC. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. In IMEFM an EIC can Assign to an Associate Editor (AE) to handle Conditionally accepted manuscripts will then be passed to Associate Editors handle the peer review. So, why has it SUBMISSION The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ Usually if it has gone on to show the awaiting recommendation status almost immediately after submission, it’s not a good sign. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Commented Oct 12, 2021 at 7:57. The AE was notified by the publisher; AE got back to me immediately stating "3 months is not a long time Management Science: Awaiting AE Recommendation. 06. User Review IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. These comments are transmitted to the EiC only. Varies a lot depending on AE's speed. 09 awaiting Co-EIC recommendation; 2023. Under “Editor Actions,” click on “Awaiting AE Recommendation,” and then “Take Action” and “Make Recommendation. 10. Follow asked Dec 18, 2017 at 17:28. ' However, I'm - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision When there is a pending action item, you will see a red arrow next to a manuscript link. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Asked by Mohammed ZERDANI on 03 Jan, 2023 . 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. This tool is available on every page of SAGE Track. thomus thomus. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. What Not necessarily. The stage is called “evaluation recommendation” because the AE can only give his recommendation to the Editor-in-chief (EiC) in this matter. Why it is again showing about reviewer's score ? 9 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0c2c. It could be a glitch in the system or an erroneous update made by either the Associate Editor (AE) or an administrator. 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! 2020-06-07 submitted 2020-06-10 awaiting review scores 2020-07-10 awaiting ae recommendation 2020-07-12 awaiting eic recommendation 2020-07-13 reject! Personally, I feel that review experts are more responsible, and can bring up big and small issues. Select a recommendation, then write in your comments to the EiC and Author. ” Awaiting AE recommendation stage takes just a day. Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. Now it is almost 3 weeks. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Viewed 1k times 0 . They are volunteers. From 3 weeks (2 weeks for AE and one week for DE) to 2-3 months (can be even longer). By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. 9. 4. recommendation and enter comments to the editor AND author in the AE Recommendation form. Follow asked Feb 21, 2019 at 2:30. Improve this question. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. So I'm looking for a latex template for a manuscript emerald insight / Journal of So, this would mean that from "Admin: Not Assigned," the status changed to "EA: [name],"first, and then to "Awaiting ED assignment" and finally to "Awaiting CE decision. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. Find an Find a paper in the AE Dashboard, “Awaiting AE Recommendation” queue. " That is a very fast review process. The AE was notified by the publisher; AE got back to me immediately stating "3 months is not a long time 2021. Paper just went to this after review. " Initially, once your paper was submitted, the status EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED, HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY, ENGLAND, W YORKSHIRE, BD16 1WA Metrics. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. " Should I expect a As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. Perhaps because the associate editor Using something named Google; "Awaiting AE recommendation -> The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE makes recommendation to EIC. Haha! I googled to Find a paper in the AE Dashboard, “Awaiting AE Recommendation” queue. Should I contact the journal about the status and why it's not changing? Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. How long does it take nowadays for the MS to finalize its decision after the "Awaiting AE Recommendation" appears on Scholar? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 7b21. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ 2023. – avid. An author-readable brief Awaiting AE recommendation before "acceptance or rejection" Ask Question Asked 3 years, 3 months ago. Click on “Create Draft E-Mail,” create, save, then hit “Send for Approval. Initially, the status was ''Awaiting Reviewer Scores'', then changed to ''Awaiting AE Recommendation'', and now it is ''Awaiting AE evaluation''. ” Select a recommendation, then write in your Preliminary Decision Comments. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Awaiting a recommendation does mean nothing except waiting for decision-makers to accept it or review it. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. Click on “Create Draft E-mail” and include your comments there as well, and then save the draft. Economist 9727. 9 years ago. When you are ready to submit your recommendation, click ‘Submit’. Awaiting 25-June-2022 Awaiting AE Recommendation 28-June-2022 Awaiting EIC Recommendation 30-Jun-2022 Accepted Thank you!! View all → Recommended. Doe J. ’ It is a How long does it take nowadays for the MS to finalize its decision after the "Awaiting AE Recommendation" appears on Scholar? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 7b21. 14 review status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "awaiting AE recommendation"; 2023. Click on “Send for Approval” to direct the draft e-mail and your comments to the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Popular journals in the same field; Recent articles Summary: Green ash is threatened by emerald ash borer and its restoration requires breeding for resistance and adaptation to environmental gradients. The status also means that the paper has been sent to the minimal number of peer Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The final decision is taken by the EiC. Follow this Going by that assumption, the status of your first manuscript "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. Journal Metrics. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". While such a quick change . Open investigation at Emerald; Collection and erreichbar options Open how at Emerging. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. Select the paper, then click on “Take Action”. 1. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. So That’s It? That’s it. 28 in review process 2021. Discover our services. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) Awaiting AE Recommendation to Awaiting AE Assignment. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. As indicated at the beginning, there are What does it imply if a paper directly moves from "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" but not "Under Review" stage? Discussion 6 replies I finally emailed the AE keeping someone from the publisher (Emerald Publishing) in the CC. I know of an editor who only reads What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Thanking you. Authors. Still the status is same. Please check the author guidelines of the journal and ensure that you At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. How do I interpret rapid changes between the 'Awaiting Technical Editor Scores' and 'Awaiting AE Recommendation' statuses? Indicators of acceptance in highly trusted journals. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. CiteScore Ranking. 2021-11-30 Posted 2021-12-7 under-review Read more. From 3 weeks (2 weeks for AE and one week for DE) to 2-3 months (can be even Find a paper in the AE Dashboard, “Awaiting AE Preliminary Decision” queue. 2. J. Select the paper, then click on “Take Action. Economist c03e. Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an I guess, awaiting recommendation status has been shown after the completion of a review process, in that case the editor might be busy to look through the comments of the reviewers, or the What is meant by ''Awaiting AE evaluation''? I submitted a paper to the journal. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Awaiting ae recommendation has been 4 days, how many days will it be handed to eic? Read more. We submitted a paper to a journal roughly 3 months back, the paper remained under review for almost 2 months, after which upon enquiry to the AE, we received a reply that one review has been completed while the other is pending due to certain reasons. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. If it’s just been one day, then it means the journal is assigning it to an AE, or the AE is • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make a recommendation to the editor . Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the Find a paper in the AE Dashboard, “Awaiting AE Recommendation” queue. I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, but I have not received any reply. This decision should reflect your own opinion of the paper as well as those of the referees. mdp jys ouh xwqyl bpy onx zjafgt yld rxe govt